If you run a small business, you probably get excited whenever a new lead, customer, or sale comes through that you can tie back to your marketing efforts. And you should! You have a limited marketing budget, so seeing those dollars translate into real results is always a good thing.
However, generating a sale is only the beginning. You also need to understand which parts of your marketing strategy helped make it happen.
That’s where marketing attribution comes in. Assigning credit to specific marketing channels and tactics can be easier said than done. Marketing attribution is a complicated, multifaceted process that many small businesses struggle to get right.
Despite these challenges, attribution is critical to measuring your marketing performance. Without a well-defined approach, you risk misjudging which tactics are working, wasting budget on the wrong channels, and missing opportunities to improve your strategy.
Want to better understand how marketing attribution works? Read on to learn about three common approaches and when each might make sense for your business.
First-Touch Attribution
First-touch marketing attribution is relatively straightforward. The marketing channel or tactic that first brings a lead into contact with your business gets credit for the resulting deal or sale.
Because it’s easy to understand and implement, many businesses start here. But what happens when the customer journey gets a little more complicated?
Imagine you run a medical practice and use direct mail to encourage prospective patients to schedule an appointment. Someone receives your mailer and decides to look up your office online. So far, the mailer seems to be doing its job.
But what if that person then finds negative Google reviews, discovers a competitor with stronger SEO, or sees a compelling Google Ads campaign from another practice?
Suddenly, the mailer is only one part of the equation. Your online reputation, search visibility, and paid advertising may all influence whether that prospective patient ultimately books an appointment.
If you rely exclusively on first-touch attribution, you might give the mailer all the credit and increase your direct mail budget while overlooking the other tactics that help convert prospective patients into customers.
Pros:
- Easy to implement and provides a clear picture of which channels initially generate leads.
- Helps identify the marketing efforts that introduce new prospects to your business.
Cons:
- Overlooks the influence of marketing touchpoints that occur later in the customer journey.
- Can lead you to overestimate the value of initial interactions while undervaluing the tactics that help close a sale.
Best for: Businesses with relatively short, straightforward sales cycles that want to understand where new leads originate, particularly in product-based and business-to-consumer (B2C) markets.
Last-Touch Attribution
Last-touch attribution takes the opposite approach. Instead of crediting the first interaction, it credits the final marketing touchpoint before a conversion.
This model is often appealing because it clearly identifies what immediately preceded a sale or conversion. However, it has many of the same limitations as first-touch attribution, just in reverse.
Instead of overemphasizing the initial interaction, last-touch attribution can undervalue everything that happened before the final touchpoint.
For example, your sales team or website might appear to be the driving force behind your closed deals and inbound leads. And they may very well play a critical role! But a sale rarely happens in a vacuum.
A prospect might discover your business through SEO, read your content, receive an email, and visit your website several times before finally submitting a contact form. If your attribution model only credits that final website interaction, you could miss the role your other marketing efforts played in getting the prospect there.
As a result, your marketing performance might look weaker than it actually is, simply because the model doesn’t account for the full customer journey.
Pros:
- Provides a clear view of the channel or interaction immediately preceding a conversion.
- Relatively easy to implement and useful for tracking direct conversion activity.
Cons:
- Overlooks the marketing touchpoints that generate awareness, build trust, and nurture prospects.
- Can undervalue channels that influence purchasing decisions earlier in the customer journey.
Best for: Businesses with straightforward conversion paths that want to understand which channels or interactions immediately precede a sale, lead, or other defined conversion.
A Mixed Attribution Model
So, what’s the best way forward? Rather than choosing between first-touch and last-touch attribution, many businesses benefit from a mixed approach that considers multiple interactions throughout the customer journey.
The idea is simple in theory: recognize that different marketing channels and touchpoints can contribute to a conversion at different stages. In practice, however, the details can get complicated.
A mixed attribution model might assign different amounts of credit to the first interaction, subsequent marketing engagements, and the final conversion. Some businesses also use lead-scoring systems to assign points for actions such as downloading content, attending a product demo, or engaging with a sales representative.
The challenge is determining how much weight each interaction deserves. A prospect might download a whitepaper, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the download drove the purchase decision. Likewise, someone might see a social media post or hear about your business through a colleague without ever clicking a trackable link.
Tools such as UTM parameters and tracking pixels can provide additional insight into how people interact with your marketing. However, they won’t capture every interaction or tell you exactly how much each one influenced a buying decision.
That’s why an effective attribution strategy requires more than just tracking technology. You also need to understand your sales process, define meaningful conversion points, and choose a measurement approach that reflects how customers actually find and engage with your business.
You may not achieve perfect attribution, and that’s okay. The goal is to develop a more complete picture of your marketing performance so you can make better-informed decisions about where to invest your time and budget.
Pros:
- Provides a more comprehensive view of how different marketing channels contribute to conversions.
- Helps identify opportunities to improve performance across multiple stages of the customer journey.
Cons:
- More complicated to implement, maintain, and interpret than single-touch models.
- Requires reliable tracking, consistent data, and thoughtful decisions about how credit is assigned.
Best for: Businesses with longer or more complex sales cycles, multiple marketing channels, or customers who interact with the brand several times before converting.
Partner With JSL Marketing & Web Design
Struggling to understand your marketing performance or determine which tactics are driving results? Turn to JSL Marketing & Web Design!
A marketing attribution plan is only one part of an effective marketing strategy. You also need the right channels, messaging, and tactics working together to support your business goals. And just as importantly, you need a measurement strategy that helps you understand what’s working and where there’s room to improve.
Depending on your unique needs, we can help you develop a strategy that incorporates the right mix of services, including:
- Web Design
- SEO
- Email Marketing
- Social Media Management
- Content Marketing
- And More!
Ready to talk shop and build a marketing strategy with a measurement plan to match? Contact JSL Marketing & Web Design today!